RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04196
N COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code (RE) of 2X (First-term, second-term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed
to allow reentry in the military.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The applicant does not make any contentions.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on
10 May 11.
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment
Program Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air
Force Reserve, dated 28 Mar 13, his commander denied his
reenlistment because the applicant had multiple disciplinary
infractions during his enlistment and under the current
conditions is not recommended for reenlistment. The applicant
was given a Letter of Counseling for failure to obey an order, a
Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for a failed physical assessment (FA),
and received an Article 15 for being derelict in the performance
of his duties.
The applicant did not appeal this decision.
On 31 May 13, the applicant was discharged with an honorable
characterization of service and was credited with 2 years, and
21 days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. On 28 Mar 13, the applicant's
commander nonselected him for reenlistment on an AF Form 418,
the applicant acknowledged non-selection and rendered his
intent not to appeal the decision on 28 Mar 13. In accordance
with (IAW) AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders
have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection
authority. The SRP considers the members Enlisted Performance
Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from any
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with
Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to
meet required training and duty performance levels. It is clear
the applicant's commander had justification for denial of
reenlistment based on the information in the remarks section of
the AF Form 418. The applicant does not provide any proof of
an error or injustice in reference to his RE code.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, the applicant states he regrets the decisions
he made when he was in the military. The short career he had in
the military did not properly represent the kind of person he
is. He is unable to take back his poor decisions, but if given
a second chance he would use this opportunity to prove himself
redeemable.
A complete copy of the applicants response, with attachment is
at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, including his
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04196 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04196 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 14.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Nov 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 15.
Exhibit E. Applicant Rebuttal, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01176
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01176 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01913
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01913 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) be changed so he may reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code (RE) be changed so he can get back into the Air Force and continue his service. According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 1 Jun 12, his commander denied him reenlistment because he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the processing of his discharge. On 28 May 14, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05133
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05133 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (first-term or second-term or career airman not selected for reenlistment) be changed. He was honorably discharged on 31 March 2012 after serving 5 years, 5 months and 7 days. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The raters comments state Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010. On 18 Feb 11, the applicants squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...